A media agency pitch does not end when the winning agency is appointed. In many ways, that is when the most important work begins.
A successful pitch should leave an advertiser with more than a new media agency contract. It should secure a better agency model, stronger talent, clearer ways of working, competitive commercials, measurable performance expectations and specific commitments about what the agency will deliver.
But agency commitments made during a pitch do not automatically become reality.
Once the contract is signed, advertisers need to turn the winning proposal into a working relationship and put the right governance around it from day one.
So, what should you do after completing a media agency pitch?
The three priorities are:
- Onboard the new agency and translate the pitch into the operating model
- Activate and manage the Performance Related Fee (PRF) properly
- Track agency performance and pitch commitments in flight
Together, these three steps create the bridge between what was promised during the pitch and what is actually delivered afterwards.
Why does post-pitch governance matter?
Agency pitches create a unique moment of leverage.
Agencies are competing for the business. Teams are carefully selected. Commercial positions are sharpened. Service levels are discussed. Innovation is promised. Processes are designed. Performance commitments are negotiated.
It is one of the few moments when an advertiser can reset almost every aspect of its agency relationship at the same time.
The risk is assuming that the job is complete once the appointment has been announced.
It isn’t.
Over the months that follow, proposed team structures can change. New ways of working can gradually revert to old habits. Reporting can become less rigorous. Commercial commitments can become difficult to validate. PRF objectives can lose relevance. Contractual obligations can be forgotten.
None of this necessarily happens because either party is acting in bad faith.
Media agency relationships are complex. People change, priorities move, markets evolve and hundreds of decisions are made every week.
That is precisely why governance matters.
Good governance creates the structure, evidence and accountability needed to keep the new relationship aligned with the principles agreed during the pitch.
1. Onboard the agency properly
Agency onboarding is sometimes treated as an administrative transition between the end of the pitch and the start of business as usual.
It should be much more than that.
The first weeks of the relationship are when the advertiser and agency need to convert the winning proposal into an operating model that works in practice.
That means establishing clarity around responsibilities, decision rights, deliverables, governance forums, escalation routes and performance expectations.
Which agency personnel were committed during the pitch, and are those people actually joining the account? What sits with global and local teams? What are the agreed scopes and service levels? How will performance be measured? How will issues be escalated?
And importantly, what does success look like after three, six and twelve months?
> The advertiser operating model matters too
Agency performance cannot be considered in isolation.
If decision-making is slow, global and local responsibilities are unclear, briefs arrive late or stakeholders give conflicting direction, even an excellent agency model will struggle.
So onboarding should not simply ask:
“What has the agency promised?”
It should also ask:
“What do we, as the advertiser, need to do to enable this relationship to succeed?”
The strongest agency relationships have accountability on both sides.
> Create a single source of truth
One practical step is to consolidate the key outcomes of the pitch into a working governance document.
The final pitch proposal, negotiation, contract, scope of work and PRF should not live in separate places and then gradually be forgotten.
The advertiser should be able to see clearly what was agreed, who owns it, how it will be measured and when it will be reviewed.
That becomes the baseline against which the relationship is governed.
Without it, memories of what was promised during the pitch inevitably begin to diverge.
2. Activate and manage the PRF properly
The Performance Related Fee, or PRF, is one of the most powerful governance mechanisms available to an advertiser.
But only when it is actively managed.
A well-designed PRF can align advertiser objectives and agency behaviour, reward exceptional performance and create an objective framework for evaluating the relationship.
The mistake is thinking the work ends when the PRF has been negotiated.
In reality, that is when PRF management starts.
> Keep the objectives relevant and evidence-based
PRF objectives should continue to reflect what success looks like for the advertiser.
They should also balance the different dimensions of agency performance. Depending on the relationship, that might include strategic thinking, planning quality, talent, innovation, collaboration, media performance, data and technology or operational delivery.
And wherever possible, scores should be supported by evidence.
The objective is not to make the PRF bureaucratic. It is to make it credible.
> Do not wait until year end
PRF performance should be discussed throughout the year, not discovered during the annual evaluation.
If an agency is falling behind on an objective, both parties should know. Equally, if the advertiser is preventing the agency from achieving an objective, that should be visible too.
The PRF then becomes a management tool, rather than simply a mechanism for calculating a year-end payment.
Its purpose is not to catch the agency out. It is to create alignment, recognise excellent performance and address problems while there is still time to improve the outcome.
The advertiser should retain ownership of this process, with independent oversight where appropriate, particularly when remuneration is being assessed.
3. Track agency commitments and performance in flight
A media agency pitch can produce dozens of commitments.
If they are not captured and tracked systematically, it becomes remarkably easy for them to disappear into the background once the relationship becomes busy.
> What should you track?
The precise framework will vary, but most significant pitch commitments fall into six areas:
- People and service: team structure, seniority, FTEs, continuity, scope and service levels
- Media performance: buying commitments, quality, effectiveness and agreed performance standards
- Commercials: fees, savings or value guarantees, AVBs and other commercial commitments
- Transparency: proprietary media, principal-based buying, digital technical costs and other transparency obligations
- Capability and innovation: data, technology, reporting, tools and innovation commitments
- Contract and governance: PRF performance, contractual obligations, ways of working and market-level delivery
The principle is simple:
If a commitment was important enough to influence the agency appointment, it should be important enough to track afterwards.
> Annual media audits are useful, but they are not enough
Independent media audits remain an important part of agency governance. They establish evidence, identify performance gaps and provide an objective view of areas that can otherwise be difficult for advertisers to assess.
But governance should not rely exclusively on an annual retrospective exercise.
If a commitment begins to drift in February, finding out the following January is not particularly helpful.
Important indicators should be tracked in flight, allowing the advertiser and agency to identify issues early and agree corrective action while there is still time to influence the result.
That changes the conversation from:
“Why didn’t you deliver what you promised?”
to:
“We can see this commitment is currently off track. What needs to happen now to correct it?”
That is better for the advertiser and better for the agency.
> Good governance strengthens the agency relationship
Post-pitch governance should not be about policing the agency.
Done well, it creates clarity for both parties.
The advertiser understands what it should expect. The agency understands how performance will be assessed. Strong work is recognised, issues are surfaced earlier and both parties work from the same evidence.
Accountability and partnership are not opposites. The best agency relationships have both.
> A simple post-pitch governance test
If you are currently running or have recently completed a media agency pitch, ask yourself one question:
Could we clearly demonstrate today whether the major commitments that influenced our agency selection are being delivered?
If the answer is yes, your governance is probably working.
If the answer is “we think so”, “the agency tells us they are” or “we’ll find out at the annual review”, there is probably more work to do.
And the best time to address that is before the pitch ends, while commitments are still being negotiated.
For every significant promise, ask:
How will we measure it? Who will own it? How often will we review it?
A commitment that cannot be clearly defined, measured or governed may not be a particularly useful commitment.
Conclusions
A well-run media agency pitch can create significant value. But selecting the right agency is only part of the job.
The next challenge is turning the strategic, operational, commercial and contractual commitments secured during the pitch into everyday delivery.
That requires three things:
Onboard properly. Manage the PRF actively. Govern performance and commitments in flight.
The objective is not simply stronger agency accountability.
It is a better media agency partnership.
At Abintus, this is how we think about the agency lifecycle:
PREPARE. PITCH. GOVERN.
We help advertisers establish the evidence and requirements before a review, find the right agency partner and secure the right commitments during the pitch, and independently govern the relationship afterwards to help ensure those commitments become delivery.
If you are currently running a media agency pitch, or preparing to onboard a newly appointed agency, book a short conversation with us about how to design post-pitch governance from day one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
About the Author
Philippe Dominois, co-founder and CEO of Abintus Consulting and Head Coach at the Abintus Academy, brings over 25 years of global media expertise to the table. With a wealth of experience from his tenure at leading media agencies such as Wavemaker, Starcom, and Carat, as well as more than a decade at Ebiquity, Philippe has established himself as a thought leader in the industry. He has authored hundreds of articles focusing on media management best practices, sharing his insights and knowledge with the wider media community.
Frequently Asked Questions:
What should you do immediately after a media agency pitch?
Once an agency has been appointed, advertisers should focus on three priorities: onboarding the agency and implementing the agreed operating model, activating and managing the Performance Related Fee, and establishing ongoing governance to track agency performance and pitch commitments.
What is post-pitch media governance?
Post-pitch media governance is the ongoing process of ensuring that the strategic, operational, commercial and contractual commitments agreed during a media agency pitch are delivered in practice. It can include performance tracking, PRF management, contract compliance, commercial validation, auditing, transparency and regular relationship reviews.
Why is agency onboarding important after a pitch?
Onboarding converts the winning agency proposal into a functioning operating model. It creates clarity around teams, responsibilities, processes, deliverables, decision-making, performance expectations and governance before ambiguity has an opportunity to develop.
How should a media agency PRF be managed?
A PRF should have clearly defined objectives, measurable criteria and appropriate evidence. Performance should be reviewed during the year rather than only at year end, and the advertiser should retain independent oversight of the scoring and evaluation process.
What commitments should be tracked after a media agency pitch?
Advertisers should track any commitments that materially influenced the agency appointment. These may include agency talent and staffing, media performance, service levels, fees, savings, transparency, technology, data, innovation, PRF objectives, contractual commitments and agreed ways of working.
Is an annual media audit enough?
An annual audit provides valuable independent evidence, but it should not be the only governance mechanism. Important performance indicators and agency commitments should also be monitored during the year so that issues can be identified and corrected while there is still time to influence the outcome.
Who should govern the media agency relationship?
Governance is typically shared between Marketing or Media and Procurement, with other functions involved where necessary. The advertiser should retain ownership, although independent specialist support can provide additional capacity, expertise and objective verification.


