Have you ever wondered if your media agency prioritises your brand's success or their own financial gain?
This question becomes crucial when considering Agency Volume Bonuses (AVBs).
While AVBs present potential financial benefits, they also raise ethical concerns that advertisers shouldn't ignore.
This article will uncover the secretive world of AVBs, how they work, the risks for advertisers, and provide advertisers the knowledge and tools to recapture this lost value.
The concept of Agency Volume Bonuses (AVBs), also known in some contexts as cash rebates or kickbacks, has been a prevalent practice in the advertising industry, particularly in media buying.
These are benefits or bonuses provided by media vendors to advertising agencies or media buying groups based on the volume of advertising that the agency purchases on behalf of its clients.
The practice incentivises agencies to concentrate their media buys with specific providers to receive better pricing or bonuses, which can then be passed on to savvy clients or retained in part (or in full) by media agencies.
For years, AVBs were kept secret, acting as hidden revenue streams for media agencies. Media owners provided rebates to agencies based on spending levels - the more an agency spent, the higher their kickback. Agencies neglected to disclose these payments to advertisers, keeping the AVBs entirely for themselves.
According to research by the Association of National Advertisers (ANA), this practice was pervasive - in 2016 over 90% of surveyed advertisers were completely unaware of AVBs. For agencies, the incentives were clear - AVBs represented hundreds of millions in additional revenue. However, left undisclosed, it posed a serious conflict of interest.
AVBs represent a core component of the media agency business model. Media owners such as TV networks, radio stations, publishers, and ad tech platforms provide rebates and incentives to agencies based on the amount spent across their properties.
The rebates come in various forms - cash payments, free ad inventory, discounts, and more. The rates and payment structures can be highly complex and are usually outlined in separate contracts between the agency and media owner.
The rebates increase incrementally as an agency allocates more advertiser spend towards a particular media owner. For example, a TV network may offer a 2% rebate on spend up to $1 million, a 4% rebate on spend between $1-$5 million, and a 6% rebate on spend above $5 million.
The more an agency consolidates spend with a media owner, the higher the rebate they receive. This creates an inherent incentive for agencies to focus budget on partners that provide the most attractive AVB packages.
Media owners use AVBs as a competitive tool to incentivize agencies to direct investment to their properties. From an agency perspective, AVBs have become a major component of overall revenue and profitability.
However, lack of disclosure around these incentives and payments has created distrust on the part of advertisers, who often fail to receive their share of the value. Greater transparency into the mechanics of AVBs is key to improving advertiser-agency alignment.
The appeal of AVBs for media agencies cannot be denied. They provide a financial boost, contributing to the agency's overall revenue, and in some cases, these bonuses become a significant source of income.
However, the lack of transparency surrounding AVBs can pose significant risks for advertisers, potentially jeopardising their marketing budgets and campaign effectiveness. Here's a closer look at these risks:
1/ Compromised Decision-Making:
Undisclosed AVBs introduce the risk of conflicts of interest. When agencies prioritise maximising their AVBs without disclosing them to their clients, their media buying decisions may be swayed towards options that generate higher bonuses rather than those that align best with the advertiser's campaign goals.
This can lead to suboptimal placements, inefficient budget allocation, and wasted resources, diminishing ROI for advertisers.
2/ Financial Loss:
Perhaps the most significant risk associated with undisclosed AVBs is the potential for financial loss. In many cases, the value of AVBs can be substantial, reaching upwards of 20% of an advertiser's media spend. If these bonuses are not disclosed and shared with the advertiser, they miss out on a significant potential source of revenue that could be used to:
3/ Lack of Transparency and Trust:
The lack of transparency surrounding AVBs can seriously erode the trust between advertisers and their media agencies.
Advertisers expect their agency partners to act in their best interests and make media decisions based solely on campaign optimisation. When AVBs are undisclosed, it creates suspicion and undermines trust, as advertisers might perceive that their agency is putting its financial gain ahead of the client's success.
This lack of trust can damage the agency's reputation and strain crucial client relationships, making it more difficult to build long-term partnerships and secure future business.
While AVBs have the potential to compromise trust and create conflicts of interest, there's a way to harness their power while ensuring your brand benefits fully. Here's the strategy that shifts the dynamics in your favour:
1. Claiming Your Fair Share: AVBs are meant to reward volume – your advertising volume. By understanding how AVBs work and the typical benchmarks for your industry, you can negotiate a fair share of these bonuses. Don't let your agency retain all the benefits – demand that a significant portion gets passed back to you.
2. The Pitch Power Play: During the media agency selection process, don't just focus on capabilities or costs. Make securing competitive AVB commitments a central part of your negotiations. Prioritise agencies that are willing to offer substantial pass-backs and maximum transparency around these arrangements.
3. Contracts Matter: Don't leave AVBs to chance. Embed specific AVB commitments into your media agency contract. These terms should detail the percentage of media spend across different channels and markets that will trigger AVBs and the proportion being returned to you as the advertiser.
4. Link your AVB commitments to your PRF: Here's the game-changer: link your AVB rebates to a Performance Related Fee (PRF) scheme. This scheme should incorporate both bonus and malus (penalty) mechanisms.
5. Validate your AVB delivery by end of Q2 Latest: AVBs are negotiated on a calendar basis, and therefore, you should get your contractual share or amount before the end of Q2 (ie end of June) of the following year. Don't wait for the deadline, and be proactive in chasing the payment to you as a credit note.
Why This Works:
This approach enables you to fully harness the potential of AVBs while minimising ethical concerns and prioritising your campaign goals. It's a win-win scenario where both you and your agency reap the rewards of successful advertising outcomes.
There are concrete actions advertisers can take to address AVBs and drive greater transparency:
It's important to remember that AVBs aren't insurmountable obstacles. By adopting a proactive approach, fostering transparency, and equipping yourself with knowledge, you can ensure your advertising budget is working for your brand, not solely for your agency's bottom line.
Don't navigate the complexities of AVBs alone. Schedule a complimentary consultation with our media transparency experts to assess your current agency contract and identify areas for improvement. Remember, informed decisions lead to successful advertising campaigns – so take charge and unlock the true potential of your marketing efforts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
About the Author
Media Auditing Services: Click Here
Media Agency Pitch Management Guide: Click Here
Free Media Agency Contract Assessment: Click Here
Free Media Management Training for Advertisers: Click Here